New York Daily News Giants Beat Reporter (and friend of the blog) Ralph Vacchiano starts the theme, and while I don't agree with his premise, I give him credit for a fair-and-balanced story.
Now, let's see who parrots it.
Here it is on another Giants blog.
Here again from Long Island Newsday
I could go on.
My point is not to bash on Reporters-Who-Pick-Up-Stories, per se. My point is - once an idea like this gets loose in the press, we see a multi-step process take place that looks like this:
1. Reporter Voices Controversial Opinion: "What's Wrong With Brandon Jacobs?"
2. Subject Defends Self, Hopefully Dramatically: (Jacobs' reply: "Frustration is upon me right now." )
3. Reporter's Peers Remark On Existence of Story Itself: "The New York Media™ sure is being tough on Brandon Jacobs..."
4. Vóila, the story has a life of its own.
Now. Let's pretend for a moment that you work for, oh, we don't know, say, a political party whose fortunes have not been the greatest recently. If you recognized an opportunity to use this process, wouldn't you use it to your advantage? Especially if you could just make crazy shit up and force your opponent to waste time and energy debunking it?
Yes. Yes you would. Don't lie.
We recognize this. And we will call it out wherever we see it. What should we call it? The Full Brandon Jacobs? Random Bomb-Throwing? Every Day Of Rush Limbaugh's Life?
Let us know.
No comments:
Post a Comment